Legal Opinion

North Carolina Dept. of Revenue v. Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 21, 2019No. 18-457PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayor

*2217 This case is about the limits of a State's power to tax a trust. North Carolina imposes a tax on any trust income that "is for the benefit of" a North Carolina resident. N. C. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 105-160.2 (2017). The North Carolina courts interpret this law to mean that a trust owes income tax to North Carolina whenever the trust's beneficiaries live in the State, even if-as is the case here-those beneficiaries received no income from the trust in the relevant tax year, had no right to demand income from the trust in that year, and could not count on ever receiving income from the trust. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Thole v. U. S. Bank N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Church Joint Venture, L.P. v. Earl BlasingameCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. VVF Intervest, L.L.C. v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Buckeye Inst. v. KilgoreOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Tischmak v. Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2025

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API