In the Interest of R. M.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, Judge.
In these two related cases, the mother and father1 of R. M. and R. M., Jr. (“Jr.”) each separately appeal from the juvenile court’s order adjudicating the children deprived, and both contend that there was no clear and convincing evidence that the parents did not comply with their tuberculosis treatment which was the basis for the deprivation adjudication. We disagree and affirm.
In reviewing a juvenile court’s finding of deprivation, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the juvenile court’s judgment to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- In the Interest of J. P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- In the Interest of B. M. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- In the Interest of C. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- In the Interest of K. J.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
3Cited by17 opinions
- In the Interest of D. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- In the Interest of A. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- In the Interest of R. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Tidwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- In the Interest of A. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.