Legal Opinion

Danny Baylis Huston v. Denis Dowd Dick D. Moore, Cranston J. Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1992No. 91-1642Published

1Per curiam

Danny Baylis Huston appeals from the district court’s 1 order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm.

I

Huston, while a Missouri state prisoner, filed a pro se petition for habeas corpus relief challenging the actions of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole (MBPP). Huston alleged that the crimes to which he pleaded guilty were committed on July 19, 1980. He further alleged that the MBPP cancelled his presumptive date of release from prison, July 24, 1989, because of his failure to successfully complete the Missouri Sexual Offender…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James E. Williams and Junior Theobald, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, W. R. Vermillion, Chairman F. N. Strum and Dick Moore, Members of the Board, James E. Williams and Junior Theobald, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, W. R. Vermillion, Chairman F. N. Strum and Dick Moore, Members of the BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Edward Parton v. Bill Armontrout, Edward Parton v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API