Pegram-West, Inc. v. Winston Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
The errors assigned by defendant, and set forth in the record as required by the rules of this Court are nine in number. And while prejudicial error is not made to appear, we consider them in proper groups.
I. Assignments of error Nos. 1, 2 and 4, relating to exceptions 1, 2 and 4, as stated by appellant, may be combined in this manner: That the court committed error (1) “in permitting the introduction of oral testimony to prove the terms of the contract, in variance with that set up in the complaint, — the statute of frauds having been specially pleaded”; (2) “in admiting testimony of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peele v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Palomino Mills, Inc. v. Davidson Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Peele v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Warren v. Littleton Orange Crush Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Raleigh Banking & Trust Co. v. Safety Transit Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Will of HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Piedmont Aviation, Inc. v. S & W MOTOR LINES, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Dealers Specialties, Inc. v. Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.