Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Degener

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 7, 1983No. 83-48PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

Whether a retirement plan may be required to become a party to a dissolution of marriage proceeding, is the issue on appeal.

Ann Degener petitioned for dissolution of her marriage to Paul Degener. During the course of the property distribution proceedings she sought to have the Allstate Retirement Plan and its Administrative Committee (Plan) made a party. Paul Degener was a Plan participant as a former employee of Allstate Insurance Company who, although not presently receiving benefits, would be so entitled upon reaching…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kujawinski v. KujawinskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Stone v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
  3. In Re Marriage of HuntAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Carpenters Pension Trust for Southern California v. Brenda Ann KronschnabelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. In Re Marriage of BentivengaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rush University Medical Center v. SessionsIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In Re Marriage of KorperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. In Re Marriage of KorperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API