Legal Opinion
Western Land Planning Co v. Midland National Bank
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 20, 1977No. 75-C-140, 75-C-499PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
The defendant has filed a motion for leave to file an amended answer in order to assert a counterclaim. This action has a rather involved procedural history.
The initial complaint was filed by Western Land Planning Company (Western), American Contractors, Inc. (American), and Kenneth R. Ringbloom on March 18, 1975. Midland National Bank was named as a defendant. The action arises out of a loan made by the defendant to Western. Simply stated, the plaintiffs allege that Midland wrongfully refused to disburse funds in accordance with the loan agreement.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Susquehanna Chemical Corp. v. Producers Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Matter of the Bohack Corporation, Debtor-In-Possession. The Bohack Corporation v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Big Bear Super Market No. 3 v. Princess Baking Corp. (In Re Princess Baking Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1980
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Utica Floor Maintenance, Inc. (In Re Utica Floor Maintenance, Inc.)District Court, N.D. New York · 1984
- Michaels-Stern & Co. v. Rice's Men's Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979