Legal Opinion

President & Directors of the Manhattan Co. v. Callister Bros.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

Application by petitioning bank, pursuant to section 1078 of the Civil Practice Act, for leave to bring an action against John T. Callister and William L. Callister on three renewed promissory notes indorsed by them, and made by Callister Brothers, Inc., aggregating in principal amount the sum of $179,600.

It is needless to review here the entire background and history of the prior litigation. The relevant facts on this application follow. In April, 1938, petitioner held the aforesaid three notes, then past due, and at the same time held, as collateral security, a bond and mortgage on real…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. President and Directors of the Manhattan Co. v. Callister Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central Hanover Bank v. Roslyn Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Citibank, N. A. v. Covenant InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API