Hartman Et Ux. v. Moloney, Exr.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
James, J.,
This is an action of assumpsit brought by Thomas L. Hartman and Florence Hartman, his wife, against H. A. Moloney, executor of the estate of Bridget T. Buerkle, deceased, for room and board furnished decedent from July 15, 1932 until her death on July 31, 1933. It was not disputed that plaintiffs furnished the room and board, but the claim was resisted on the theory that decedent was working for her room and board. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs, defendant’s motions for a new trial and judgment n. o. v. were refused, and from the judgment entered on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gibb's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Witten v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Brown v. McCurdySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Miller's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Nuebling to Use v. Topton Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dowman EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Tustin Et Ux. v. Isherwood, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- American Glass Corp. v. Imperial Lighting Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957