City of Cleveland v. Ezell
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Timothy E. McMonagle, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, defendants-appellants, Sam Ezell, Curtis Wiggins, and Corey Hargrove, challenge their convictions for violating various subsections of Cleveland Codified Ordinances 471.06 on the basis that the ordinance is constitutionally infirm.
Defendants Ezell, Wiggins, and Hargrove are members of an Islamic sect that encourages its members to distribute its religious newspaper, The Final Call. Defendants would wait for a traffic light to turn red and then proceed into the street between stopped cars to solicit sales of the newspaper. Sometime…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. DorsoOhio Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.