Legal Opinion

Equilease Corp. v. D'Annolfo

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 30, 1978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilda Publishing Company and D’Annolfo, individually and as trustee of the Mark-Phillip Trust, appeal from judgments in favor of Equilease for the balance due on an equipment lease. We affirm the judgments against Wilda and D’Annolfo individually, but reverse the judgment against D’Annolfo "as trustee.” 1. The only argument advanced by Wilda and D’Annolfo individually is that the judge erred in refusing to instruct the jury on Equilease’s duty to mitigate damages. However, the judge could have viewed the "lease” as a conditional sale of equipment, as the lessees had the option of purchasing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Upham v. Boaz Well Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Bitker v. Hotel Duluth Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baker v. ComptonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Fateh v. RichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Marine Midland Bank, NA v. MoranMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994
  4. DeLongchamps v. DuquetteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  5. Kline v. ReedMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API