Legal Opinion

Gaskill v. Sneaky Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 29, 1999No. 2-98-367-CVPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM BRIGHAM, Justice.

A final judgment from the small claims court may be appealed to the county court for a trial de novo. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 28.053(b) (Vernon 1988). In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether we have jurisdiction over an appeal from the county court’s final judgment after such a trial de novo. We hold that we do not.

Appellant Sheri Gaskill hired appellee Sneaky Pete’s Restaurant to cater her wedding reception. When she was dissatisfied with the food and service, she filed a pro se suit in small claims court against Sneaky Pete’s for breach of contract.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Covert, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  2. Galil Moving & Storage, Inc. v. McGregor, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sultan v. MathewTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lederman v. Rowe, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  3. Howell Aviation Services v. Aerial Ads, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  4. Woodlands Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Rodgers, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  5. Williamson v. A-1 Electric Auto Service, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API