Legal Opinion

Davis v. Milford

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 11, 1910No. 7545PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Aldrich, J., Anderson, October, 1909. Partition suit by 'C. A. Davis et al. against Jno. T. Milford, admr., et al. From Circuit decree, W. H. Pruitt appeals. cite: Legislature has the power to pass th'e act: 5 Cyc., 632. Construction of the act: 2 Swan, ■446; 39 A., 72; 16 R. I., 579; 77 Pa. St., 81; 86 Tenn., ■459; 175 N. W., 1091; 39 Ky., 170; 1 D R. A. (N. S.), 773; 5 L. R. A., 455; 22 S. E., 155; 17 Ency., 25. Oral argument.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

In this action for the partition of the land of J. F. Callaham, the question is whether William H. Pruitt, an illegitimate nephew, should be excluded. His claim depends upon the construction to be given to the following statute: •.“An act to confer the rights of legitimacy upon William H. Pruitt, of Anderson County, South Carolina.

“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the State of South Carolina, now met and sitting in General Assembly, and by authority of the same, that Wm. H. Pruitt, son of Joshua’Pruitt and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stevenson's Heirs v. SullivantSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Pratt v. AtwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Reynolds v. HitchcockSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re. Smith's EstateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  2. Foster v. RolandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API