State Insurance v. Meesman
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from, Superior Court, Clarice County. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, C. J.
— This is an action upon a fire insurance policy issued by appellant to appellee to recover a loss amounting to §221, alleged to have been sustained by appellee by reason of the destruction by fire of the property insured. The complaint was filed February 3, 1890, and service duly made. Defendant appeared and answered, setting up as a defense false representations made by plaintiff to defendant in his application for insurance, concerning his title to the land upon which the insured buildings were situated j and that, by the terms of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steen v. . Niagara Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Johnson v. Humboldt InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- Virginia Fire & Marine Ins. v. WellsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- Travelers Insurance v. California InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- Bradley v. Phœnix InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
3Cited by25 opinions
- Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Abbott v. GatchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
- Dwyer v. Bassett & BassettTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Read & Traversy v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Ashburn v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.