Legal Opinion

Casino Reinvestment Development Authority v. City of Atlantic City

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided November 15, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AXELRAD, J.T.C.

In this local property tax matter, the taxpayer, Casino Reinvestment Development Authority (“CRDA”), contests the assessments of two single family homes located at 217 Grammercy Place and 219 Grammercy Place, in the City of Atlantic City. The properties are more particularly identified on the Tax Map of the City of Atlantic City as Block 94, Lots 102.10 and 102.11, and are part of a thirty-nine unit residential subdivision known as “Madison Landing.” CRDA submits that the properties are exempt from taxation as “property of the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority” under…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Roe v. KervickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. Walter Reade, Inc. v. Township of DennisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. State v. Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. McCurdy v. McCurdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Casino Reinvestment Dev. Auth. v. BirnbaumNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  2. CASINO REINVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. CHARLES BIRNBAUM (L-0589-14, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API