Legal Opinion

Common Carrier Conference-Irregular Route v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 23, 1976No. 75-1510PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues in this case are well known to the industry, and are reasonably identified in the opinions (including the dissenting opinion) of the Interstate Commerce Commission on reconsideration. We therefore propose no extended statement of the facts and issue. At issue are the Commission’s Gateway Elimination Regulations challenged as being in excess of the Commission’s statutory authority and as being promulgated without adequate notice. These regulations govern the “gateway” problems experienced by irregular-route motor common carriers, and seek to eliminate circuitous operations resulting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Thompson Van Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Chem-Haulers, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Refrigerated Transport Co., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Auto Driveaway Co., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. Warner-Lambert Co. v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API