Marshall v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtTorpy, J.
Appellant seeks a new trial based upon the trial court’s ruling that precluded him from impeaching the victim with a prior inconsistent statement. The trial court curtailed the impeachment based on the conclusion that the prior inconsistent statement was inadmissible hearsay. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Appellant was convicted of several charges arising from a drive-by shooting of the victim, who was walking down the street when he was shot in the leg. Although it was dark, the victim said he could see the driver because the window on the driver’s side was down. He identified…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holmes v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elmer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Pierce v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Woods v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Massey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- K.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.