Commonwealth v. Liebenow
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
The defendant was convicted of larceny under $250 for the theft of steel pipes and metal plates from a construction site. G. L. c. 266, § 30. At a bench trial, the defendant claimed as an affirmative defense that he lacked the requisite specific intent to steal because he honestly believed that the metal property was abandoned. This defense was unsuccessful. The trial judge determined that the defendant’s stated belief that the pieces of metal were abandoned property — notwithstanding that these metal construction materials were being stored on private property posted with no trespassing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SherryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Ciummei v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LiebenowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Eugenia Chavez v. Pamela BondiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
- Eugenia Chavez v. Pamela BondiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025