Merastar Insurance Co. v. Webb

We affirm as to the first issue raised holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motions for mistrial and new trial based upon certain closing argument comments. Although the complained-of comments were improper, they were not so prejudicial as to mandate a mistrial or a new trial. See Matalon v. Lee, 847 So.2d 1077, 1080 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

We hold the trial court erred in admitting into evidence and refusing to strike previously undisclosed evidence of plaintiffs prescription drug bills. See generally 99 Broadcasting Co. v. Crider, 493 So.2d 462 (Fla. 4th…