Legal Opinion

Teer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1996No. 0578-95PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated kidnapping and sentenced to forty years imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction, but reversed the judgment as to punishment. Teer v. State, 895 S.W.2d 845 (Tex.App.— Waco 1995). The McLennan County District Attorney and the State Prosecuting Attorney (collectively, “the State”) filed petitions for discretionary review which we granted.

*12Upon careful consideration of the grounds for review and the briefs, we conclude that the State’s petitions were improvidently…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Teer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995

4Cited by53 opinions

  1. Hines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Drew Ryser v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  4. Lavarry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  5. Young v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API