Legal Opinion

Da-Col Paint Manufacturing Co. v. American Indemnity Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1974No. B-4704PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

The legal questions presented are whether a supplier of paint gave timely notice to the proper parties such as will support its claim against the surety on a Hardeman Act payment bond, and whether the claimant may recover against the surety on a bond executed by a sham contractor as principal.

Da-Col Paint Manufacturing Company instituted suit against C. Hayman Construction Company for payment for paint it delivered to Hayman. Da-Col also joined as defendants, Shiloh Terrace Apartments, a partnership, and American Indemnity Company, the surety upon the apparent original…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Lyon-Gray Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland v. FelkerTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Trinity Universal Insurance Company v. Barlite, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. American Indemnity Co. v. Da-Col Paint Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. First National Bank in Graham v. SledgeTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Argonaut Ins. Co. v. ABC Steel Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Texas Construction Associates, Inc. v. BalliCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Trinity Drywall Systems, LLC v. TOKA General Contractors, Ltd., and Vineyard Village, MSV, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013
  5. Berger Engineering Co. v. Village Casuals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API