Hentig v. Redden
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Memorandum. — Error from Shawnee district court; John Guthrie, judge. Application for the benefit of the occupying-claimant law, made by A. J. Hentig in the case of J. "W. Redden against A. J. Hentig. Judgment for plaintiff. The defendant brings the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gar ver, J. :
This case comes with a familiar face into the appellate courts, having been before the supreme court at three different times prior to this, leaving its impress upon the records in 35 Kas. 473, 38 Kas. 500, and 45 Kas. 20.
The defendants in error urge upon the court a motion to dismiss on the ground that the defects in the record forbid a consideration of the assignments of error. We think the record is sufficient to present fairly the rulings of the district court of which complaint is made : the instructions to the jury, the findings of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bright v. BoydU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1841
- Putnam v. RitchieNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Dean v. FeelySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Parsons v. MosesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Van Wagoner v. WhitmoreUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Gibson v. FieldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Board of County Commissioners v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
- Elm Park Iowa, Inc. v. DennistonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Hills v. AllisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.