Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Cowan v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1993No. 90-CF-327Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRogers, Chief Judge

The majority’s analysis is, in my view, most critically flawed because it fails to come to grips with the two factual scenarios presented to the jury: one presented by the government in which appellant was the shooter of Knox, the drug purchaser, and a second scenario presented by the defense in which Giles, the seller of drugs, was the shooter. By extracting isolated portions of the transcript, the majority concludes that appellant tied his request for self-defense instructions to the government’s request for an aiding and abetting instruction with regard to felony murder. Majority opinion…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Carella v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Paul Belton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Gray v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. United States v. Bennie L. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API