Cowan v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRogers, Chief Judge
The majority’s analysis is, in my view, most critically flawed because it fails to come to grips with the two factual scenarios presented to the jury: one presented by the government in which appellant was the shooter of Knox, the drug purchaser, and a second scenario presented by the defense in which Giles, the seller of drugs, was the shooter. By extracting isolated portions of the transcript, the majority concludes that appellant tied his request for self-defense instructions to the government’s request for an aiding and abetting instruction with regard to felony murder. Majority opinion…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Carella v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Paul Belton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Gray v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- United States v. Bennie L. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.