Legal Opinion

Daigle v. Mumphrey

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1997No. 96-CA-1891PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

691 So.2d 260 (1997)

Ronald DAIGLE, et al.

v.

Genesis MUMPHREY, et al.

No. 96-CA-1891.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

March 12, 1997.

Brian G. Shearman, Lawrence D. Wiedemann, Wiedemann & Wiedemann, New Orleans, for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

David K. Persons, Dee O'Neil Andrews, Metairie, for Defendants/Appellees.

Before BYRNES, LOBRANO and PLOTKIN, JJ.

PLOTKIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs Ronald and Barbara Daigle (hereinafter "the Daigles") appeal a trial court judgment based on a jury verdict finding Ms. Daigle 100 percent negligent for a vehicular accident which caused her injuries. We affirm.

Facts

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chambers v. GraybielLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Eubanks v. BrassealSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. Anthony v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Welch v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Averna v. INDUSTRIAL FABRICATION AND MARINE SERVICELouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LeRougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Bloxham v. HDI-Gerling Am. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Johnson v. MagittLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Brandon v. TrosclairLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Brewer v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API