State v. Sunderland
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
NAKAYAMA, J.
Defendant-Appellant, Joseph Sunderland (“Sunderland”), appeals from the third circuit disti'ict court’s1 June 23, 2004 judgment convicting him of the offense of Promoting a Detrimental Drug in the Third Degree, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (“HRS”) § 712-1249.2 Sunderland’s sole *397point of error on appeal asserts that his possession of marijuana at home and for religious purposes was protected by the free exercise clause of the first amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as his right to privacy under article I, section 6 of the Hawai'i…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bresee v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- State v. Armitage.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
- v. TorlineColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- Aig Hawaii Insurance Company, Inc. v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Armitage.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.