Legal Opinion

Soileau v. SMITH'S TRUE VALUE AND RENTAL

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 2010No. 09-1066, 09-1279PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIMMIE C. PETERS, Judge.

| iThese consolidated matters involve a dispute over discovery compliance. The defendants, John Deere Limited and Deere & Company (also referred to collectively as “Deere”), brought this appeal, seeking reversal of the trial court’s judgment sanctioning them for failure to comply with its discovery order. The plaintiff, Mary Phyllis Soileau, has answered the appeal, seeking additional sanctions. For the following reasons, we reduce the award of expenses, affirm in all other respects, and remand with instructions.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY ON APPEAL

The consolidation of these…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Horton v. McCarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Hutchinson v. Westport Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  4. Jack v. Alberto-Culver USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  5. Columbia Homestead Ass'n v. ArnoultLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Soileau v. Smith True Value & RentalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Mary Phyllis Soileau v. Smith True Value and RentalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API