United States Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Alaska
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DECKER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, the United States and the State of Illinois, brought this suit alleging defendant, Dr. St. Barth Alaska (Dr. Alaska), violated the Federal False Claims Act and the Illinois Public Aid Code. While this case was pending, Dr. Alaska filed suit in state court to recover on a fire insurance claim. He subsequently assigned the claim to his wife, Mrs. Dixeena Alaska, as part of their divorce settlement. After he assigned the claim, this court entered a $2.2 million judgment against Dr. Alaska. In order to attempt to partially satisfy…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickey v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- First Security Bank v. BawollAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Wilkey v. WaxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Alan Drey Company, Inc. v. Generation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Ruskin v. RodgersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Scholes v. LehmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Wieboldt Stores, Inc. v. SchottensteinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Scholes v. LehmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Heritage Bank Tinley Park v. Steinberg (In Re Grabill Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- United States v. SchippersDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.