Legal Opinion

Clokey v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1914No. 22,609PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prom Huntington Circuit Court; B. H. Hurd, Special Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Mitchell C. Clokey. Prom a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Appellant was charged by indictment with the crime of rape on a girl fourteen years of age. His trial resulted in a conviction of assault and battery with intent to commit rape. Error is assigned on the overruling of his motion for a new trial.

1

During a long cross-examination of appellant the prosecuting attorney asked him many questions in relation to various criminal and discreditable acts. To most of these questions appellant interposed no objection. In some few instances he objected because the question was “incompetent”, or “irrelevant”, or “illegal”— objections of such a general nature…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Ex parte NessonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Huber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eiffe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Barksdale v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Meadows v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. People v. JaramilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Reed v. Trainor D/B/A Tri-City R. & SmwIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API