Legal Opinion

Kindsvater v. Hineman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1957No. 40, 638PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This was a suit on a promissory note payable to plaintiff (appellee) and executed on December 30,1948 by W. F. Muyres and his wife, now Le Nore Hineman, defendant (appellant), in the sum of $5,407.12, due one year after date. The note contained the provision, “For consideration mentioned above the undersigned hereby sells and conyeys to said payees the following property, . . . kept . . . Los Angeles County, California . . .” No property was described or listed in the note. The note contained an endorsement, “August 27, 1951 Credit $1525.00.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of Osborn v. MullikenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Gorrill v. GoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fisher v. PendletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Pletcher v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Fisher v. PendletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API