Legal Opinion

Bumpus v. Cobb

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1932No. 4276Published

1Opinion of the CourtBlalock, Chief Justice

(after stating the case as above).

We find that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain this writ of error, and to consider the errors assigned. No disposition was made in the judgment, or otherwise, of the claims of Eugene Cobb and Bertha Cobb, two of the plaintiffs ■ below. Eugene Cobb was not mentioned in the court’s charge, the verdict of the jury, or the judgment of the court, and there is nothing in the said judgment from which it could be construed as having disposed of or adjudicated the claims of Eugene Cobb and Bertha Cobb to an interest in the subject-matter of the lawsuit.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Pac. Co. v. UlmerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Havard v. Carter-Kelley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Busby v. SchrankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Walker v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Turner-Cummings Hardwood Co. v. Phillip A. Ryan Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API