Legal Opinion

Nottingham v. Cooley

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 2022No. 4:19-cv-00595Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES E. NOTTINGHAM, Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-00595 v. (MEHALCHICK, M.J.) JASON COOLEY, et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment (Doc. 74); motion for discovery (Doc. 75); and motion to quash (Doc. 76), filed by pro se prisoner-Plaintiff James E. Nottingham (“Nottingham”). This is a pro se civil rights action initiated by Nottingham, a prisoner incarcerated in the State Correctional Institute at Camp Hill (“SCI-Camp Hill”), upon the filing of a complaint pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
Albert J. Gaiardo and Patricia Gaiardo, His Wife v. Ethyl Corporation, A/K/A Ethyl Corporation, Visqueen DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
Montgomery v. De SimoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.