Legal Opinion

Ennis v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 21, 1930No. Docket Nos. 15281, 24961, 24962Published

1. Caroline J. Shaw, Executrix,21 B.T.A. 400, followed. 2. The Board has no jurisdiction where a deficiency notice is sent to a corporation and a partnership files a petition.

1Opinion of the Court

E. N. & O. M. ENNIS, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

OSCAR M. ENNIS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

E. N. ENNIS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Ennis v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 15281, 24961, 24962.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

21 B.T.A. 406; 1930 BTA LEXIS 1853;

November 21, 1930, Promulgated

1. Caroline J. Shaw, Executrix,21 B.T.A. 400, followed.

2. The Board has no jurisdiction where a deficiency notice is sent to a corporation and a partnership files a petition.

Joseph E. Pottle, Esq., and J. C. Murphy,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shaw v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  2. Ennis v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API