Legal Opinion

Friedel, LLC v. Lindeen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2017No. DA 16-0358PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shea

¶1 Friedel, LLC (Friedel) successfully obtained documents from the Montana State Auditor’s Office, and requested attorney fees pursuant to § 2-3-221, MCA. The Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, denied Friedel’s request and it appealed the Order of the District Court. We address the following issue:

Whether the District Court abused its discretion by denying Friedel’s request for attorney fees.

¶2 We affirm.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶3 Friedel is a surety insurance (bail bond) company in the State of Montana. On February 11, 2014, the Office of the Montana State…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gaustad ex rel. M.G. v. City of ColumbusMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Matter of Investigative Records of City of Columbus Police Dept.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Yellowstone County v. Billings GazetteMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In RE PETITION OF BILLINGS HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 v. GazetteMontana Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. City of Billings and MMIAMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. MEIC v. GovernorMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Fox v. BHCC II, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Sloway Cabin v. ExtremeMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Waddell v. StuderMontana Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API