Legal Opinion

United States v. Ralph Hubert Barger, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 11, 1972No. 71-2581PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The principal question in this appeal is this: does the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment preclude the conviction and sentence of a person for the crime of “bail jumping” [18 U.S.C. § 3150] after bail given pursuant to Rule 46 F.R.Cr.P. is duly forfeited. The answer is clearly “no.”

A bail bond in a criminal action is a form of contract between the government on the one part and the accused and his surety on the other. Such bonds are conditioned upon the presence of the accused at specified times during the criminal proceedings and provide a monetary penalty upon condition broken.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. HawleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Richard W. SuterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Peter Calvin Jones, and W. R. Kenney, Professional BondsmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Glenn Richard Roher, International Fidelity Insurance Company, SuretyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API