Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Clinton Valley Center

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1988No. Docket 98767, 101944PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this consolidated appeal, plaintiffs appeal from two orders. The first is the order of the” Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board reversing the decision of the referee granting workers’ compensation benefits to plaintiff Mary L. Dunlap. The wcab reversed on the grounds that plaintiff’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. The second is the order of the Court of Claims which held that plaintiffs’ action was barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse the first order and affirm the second.

The facts are undisputed. In December, 1980, plaintiff Mary L. Dunlap was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mair v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Parrott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Consolidated Engineering Co. v. FeikinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Crane Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Griffin v. Acme Coal Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tate v. GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hoffman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Livering v. Richardson's RestaurantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. St. Anthony Hospital v. JamesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Secor v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API