Legal Opinion

Gray v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1896No. 8762PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Bourbon District Court. Hon. S. H. Allen, Judge. The original action was brought by B. F. Holmes and Una Holmes against Elizabeth E. Huffman and Matilda Gray for the partition of certain real estate of which Adam Huffman died seized, the same not being necessary for the payment of debts. Adam Huffman married Sophronia Gray, daughter of B. "W. and Sarah Gray, in 1860. William H. Huffman ivas born in July, 1861, the only child of said marriage.

Read the full summary

Error from Bourbon District Court. Hon. S. H. Allen, Judge. The original action was brought by B. F. Holmes and Una Holmes against Elizabeth E. Huffman and Matilda Gray for the partition of certain real estate of which Adam Huffman died seized, the same not being necessary for the payment of debts. Adam Huffman married Sophronia Gray, daughter of B. "W. and Sarah Gray, in 1860. William H. Huffman ivas born in July, 1861, the only child of said marriage. Sarah Gray died intestate January 1, 1862. Her daughter, Sophronia J. Huffman, died intestate January 7,1862, and said child William H.…

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, C, J.

1. Inheritance by adopted child. I. It was assumed but not decided in Renz v. Drury, ante, page 84, that a child adopted in a sister state in substantial compliance with her statutes, would inherit lands of the deceased adopting parent in this State on equal terms with a child of such parent born in wedlock. This proposition, however, is now earnestly controverted by the plaintiffs in error. Counsel says that Alice Ann Adamson could not have inherited from Adam Huffman in the absence of sections 6 and 7 of chapter 67 of the General Statutes of 1889 ( ¶ ¶ 3873, 3874), relating to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Van Matre v. SankeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Power v. HafleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  4. Moran v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Fosburgh v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. VieleNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Darling v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Estate of WinchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. In re Walworth's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
  5. Shick v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API