Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McCafferty

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1976No. 92PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This case comes to us on an appeal taken by the Commonwealth from an order dismissing with prejudice, pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100, the charges against Rory McCafferty.

Rule 1100 provides, in pertinent part, that trial in a court case in which a written complaint is filed against the defendant between June 30, 1973 and July 1, 1974 shall commence no later than 270 days from the date the complaint is filed. Any period of delay resulting from the unavailability of the defendant is excluded. The period is subject to extension upon a showing by the Commonwealth that trial cannot…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KovacsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. WarmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API