Legal Opinion

State v. Kendrick

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 13, 2011No. A11A0661PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.

Charged with the burglary of a dwelling house of another with the intent to commit a theft therein, Michael Kendrick moved to exclude statements he made to a police patrol officer and to a police investigator. The trial court conducted a hearing, after which it granted Kendrick’s motion. In this appeal, the state contests the exclusion of the statement to the police investigator, but has demonstrated no reversible error. We affirm.

The evidence, which was presented at the hearing through the testimony of the patrol officer and the investigator, showed the following. On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Franks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Jennings v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  2. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  3. Dailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Chavez-Ortega v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  5. Adrian Pressley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API