Legal Opinion

Frederick Equity Exchange v. Smith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1923No. File No. 5501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGate'S, J.

This is an action to' recover the value of goods, wares and merchandise sold by plaintiff to defendants as partners. The defendant Smith had departed from the state and was not served with process. The defendant Cantwell denied the partnership and alleged that the mlerchandi'Se sold was sold to Smith on his individual account in his threshing business in which Cantwell was not interested. The court found for the plaintiff. From the judgment and order denying new trial, defendant Cantwell appeals.

*138 It would serve no useful purpose-to state the facts, because no legal principle is involved. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Overton v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Botsford Lumber Co. v. SchriverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Overton v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Burt v. GageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Little v. PlummerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API