Legal Opinion

Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia & Vicinity v. Central Michigan Trucking Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 17, 1987No. G85-653 CA1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MILES, Senior District Judge.

This action arises under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (MPPAA), 29 U.S.C. § 1382.

Plaintiffs are seeking to collect withdrawal liability from Fuqua Industries Inc. (Fuqua), as well as various affiliates of Interstate Motor Freight Systems (Interstate). To date, only Fuqua has responded to the complaint and contested liability. All other named defendants are inactive and apparently insolvent. (See joint status report.) Consequently, the Court will treat Fuqua as the only defendant for purposes of this action.

Interstate was a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
United States v. Articles of Device Consisting of Three Devices . . . "Diapulse''Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
Solomon v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Plaintiff v. Bellmont Trucking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Cmsh Company, Inc., Cmsh Framing v. Carpenters Trust Fund for Northern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1989