Legal Opinion

Keibler-Thompson Corp. v. Steading

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 11, 2005No. 1030907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Keibler-Thompson Corporation appeals from the trial court's denial of its "postjudgment motion for a judgment as a matter of law, motion for a remittitur, and motion for a new trial." Because we conclude that Keibler-Thompson is entitled to a new trial, we reverse and remand.

United States Steel Corporation ("USS") operates a steel plant in Jefferson County. The plant uses a "blast furnace" to make pig iron, which is eventually refined to produce steel.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Carter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Ricwil, Inc. v. S.L. Pappas and Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. General Motors Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Ex Parte BenfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Jordan Ex Rel. Jordan v. CallowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. 412 South Court Street, LLC v. Alabama Psychiatric Services, P.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  5. Lively v. KilgoreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API