Chattanooga Glass Co. v. Baton Rouge "76" Bottling Co.

We will concern ourselves only with the alternative ground for a rehearing set forth in appellant’s application as all other contentions are fully covered in the original judgment. Alternatively, appellants contend that this Court erred in failing to hold that Tyree was liable for two-fifths of the debt sued on as a result of his purchase of an undivided two-fifths interest in the business from the Mitchells prior to the institution of this suit on April 1, 1947 and rely on the case of Hughes v. Waldo, 14 La.Ann. 348. This case is not applicable as there- was no Bulk Sales Statute at that *819time…