Butler v. State

We have for review the decision in Butler v. State, 723 So.2d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), on the basis of express and direct conflict. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89, 106 (Fla.2000), we quash the district court’s decision and remand for further proceedings in light of our opinion in Maddox.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.