Legal Opinion

Stoefen v. Brooks

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1939No. File No. 8251PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ROBERTS, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by a breach of warranty. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs on which judgment was rendered. From the judgment and order denying motion for new trial, the defendants have appealed.

Plaintiffs allege that defendants David A. Brooks and Daniel F. Brooks, composing a partnership under the firm name of Brooks Bros. Farm Machinery Co., maintain a place of business in the city of Sioux Falls; that on August 28, 1937, the defendants sold to plaintiffs a Massey-Harris Model 25 Power Unit; that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farmers' Elevator Co. v. SwierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Reed v. CoughranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Clark Implement Co. v. PriebeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Robertson v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sabbagh v. Professional & Business Men's Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Moncur v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Carr v. Benike, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re GridleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1992
  5. Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance Company of Iowa v. Fox Turkey Farms, Inc., Fox Turkey Farms, Inc. v. Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance Company of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API