Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Schusterman v. Rosen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 31, 1932PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

These are five actions of tort. The three female plaintiffs seek to recover for personal injuries sustained while riding in an automobile as guests of the defendant. The actions brought by the male plaintiffs are to recover for consequential damages arising out of injuries to their respective wives. The defendant is related to all the plaintiffs. The accident occurred in the town of Hancock, on the main highway between Albany and Pittsfield, when an automobile, owned by the defendant’s husband and operated by the defendant, collided with a truck. On the morning of October 29, 1929, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Posell v. HerscovitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Buckley v. FrankelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Caron v. Lynn Sand & Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Gallagher v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Curley v. MahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Bessey v. SalemmeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Donahue v. Dal, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API