Legal Opinion

Ray v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 18, 2002No. CR 02-317PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant, Timothy Ray, by and through his attorney, Herbert T. Wright, has filed a motion for belated appeal, which will be treated as a motion for rule on the clerk. See Johnson v. State, 342 Ark. 709, 30 S.W.3d 715 (2000) (citing Muhammed v. State, 330 Ark. 759, 957 S.W.2d 692 (1997)). Mr. Wright admits in the instant motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Accordin…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Muhammed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Venis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API