Alaska Industrial Board v. Chugach Electric Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentDenman, Chief Judge
I dissent from the majority opinion’s harsh and unjust conclusion resulting from its failure to apply to the relationship between the statutory provisions for total permanent and total temporary disability, the same liberal rule of interpretation of the Supreme Court and this court,1 that the maj ority opinion does in considering the statute’s time limitations.
It is obvious and admitted by the majority opinion that an employee’s loss of two limbs, here a hand and a foot, does not create his total disability to work. There are many employments for a person with one good hand who can walk with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Voris v. EikelSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Baltimore & Phila. Steamboat Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. RaynorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rice v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Shell Oil Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.