In re Stillman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent is an attorney admitted to practice in New York by this court on July 11, 1956. He is charged by the Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District in two separate petitions with multiple violations of the disciplinary rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility, specifically, DR 1-102 (A) (1), violating a disciplinary rule; DR 1-102 (A) (4), engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; DR 1-102 (A) (6), engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law; DR 6-101 (A) (3), neglecting a legal…
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re StenstromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993