Legal Opinion

In re Stillman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent is an attorney admitted to practice in New York by this court on July 11, 1956. He is charged by the Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District in two separate petitions with multiple violations of the disciplinary rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility, specifically, DR 1-102 (A) (1), violating a disciplinary rule; DR 1-102 (A) (4), engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; DR 1-102 (A) (6), engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law; DR 6-101 (A) (3), neglecting a legal…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re StenstromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API