People v. Moore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
We agree with defendant that the court abused its discretion in failing sua sponte to order a competency hearing to determine whether defendant was fit to proceed at the time of sentencing *1781(see People v Garrasi, 302 AD2d 981, 983 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 538 [2003]; see also People v Armlin, 37 NY2d 167, 171-172 [1975]; People v Bangert, 22 NY2d 799, 800 [1968]; see generally People v Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757, 765-766 [1999], cert denied 528 US 834 [1999]). Although a defendant is presumed to be competent (see Tortorici, 92 NY2d at 765) and “[t]he determination of whether to order a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. TortoriciNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. ArmlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. CipollinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BangertNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MincklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- MINCKLER, JAMES D., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. MincklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. MincklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017