Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We agree with defendant that the court abused its discretion in failing sua sponte to order a competency hearing to determine whether defendant was fit to proceed at the time of sentencing *1781(see People v Garrasi, 302 AD2d 981, 983 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 538 [2003]; see also People v Armlin, 37 NY2d 167, 171-172 [1975]; People v Bangert, 22 NY2d 799, 800 [1968]; see generally People v Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757, 765-766 [1999], cert denied 528 US 834 [1999]). Although a defendant is presumed to be competent (see Tortorici, 92 NY2d at 765) and “[t]he determination of whether to order a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. TortoriciNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. People v. ArmlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. CipollinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. People v. BangertNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MincklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. MINCKLER, JAMES D., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. MincklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. MincklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API