Legal Opinion

In re Vitelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 24, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

In this proceeding, the respondent was served with a peti*10tion containing 10 charges of professional misconduct against him. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained Charges One through Five and Charge Seven, sustained Charge Six on limited grounds, and failed to sustain Charges Eight, Nine, and Ten. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report with respect to Charges One, Two, Three, Four, Five, and Seven, to modify the basis on which the Special Referee sustained Charge Six, and to disaffirm with respect to. Charges Eight, Nine, and Ten.…

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zaritsky v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Matter of VitelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API