Legal Opinion
Van Schaick v. Astor
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided September 20, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSchimmel, J.
Plaintiff, as Superintendent of Insurance, is the conservator of the property within this State of the Union Indemnity Company (hereinafter referred to as the company), a Louisiana stock corporation, which was duly licensed to carry on the business of insurance in New York. In such capacity plaintiff has brought this action to recover of the defendant premiums due on two certain policies during a period prior to the order of conservation, which was entered in the Supreme Court of this State on January 9, 1933.
Under divers policies which had been issued by the company to the defendant, other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Empire State Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- People v. . Metropolitan Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- In Re the General Assignment of HevenorNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Brainerd v. . DunningNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- In re AdamsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Skandia America Reinsurance Corp. v. SchenckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977